Business eServices Government Visitors Departments
 
graphic banner
Northeast Corridor Public Meeting
 

Public Comments Summary

August 27, 2002

Sugaw Creek Presbyterian Church, Charlotte

 

 

Purpose of the Meeting:

To provide the results of the entire corridor major investment study, and receive and record citizens' comments.

 

Attendees:   64

 

Staff:

City of Charlotte Lead Staff:

Sarah W. La Belle, Project Manager, CATS

Brian Nadolny, Transit Planner, CATS

Jessica Stipe, Community Relations Specialist, CATS

Kathy Cornett, Project Manager, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission

 

Consultant Team:

Myrna Valdez, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas

Sashi Amatya, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas

Lynn Purnell, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas

Donal Simpson, HNTB

Kevin Hall, HNTB

 

Public Comments:

C: Support connections to Concord Mills (Cabarrus MPO).

C: Cabarrus bus system would connect to CATS at Concord Mills (NE-3 or NE7).

C: Local property owner prefers NE-7, with NE-4 or NE-5 as next preference.

C: Need to look at expanding service not only on US29, but also on NC49 to the University's front door and the neighborhoods beyond I-485 such as Wexford.

C: Light rail on US29 does not directly serve the University.  Need to try to serve the campus more directly with transit.

C: Vote for LRT alternative along Brevard with station at 36th Street.

C: More buses for the University area (Rt. #39).  Twenty minute headways needed plus an earlier bus from UNCC (6:40 a.m.).

C: More local routes and stops needed in the University area (NC49 and Pavilion).

C: Need local service to new NE CPCC campus.

C: LRT terminus should be at NC49/I-485 – possible connection to future commuter rail and Amtrak.

C: I like the LRT alternatives that use the dedicated lane on N. Tryon.

C: I like NE-4 and NE-7 with a station at 36th Street.

C: It makes sense for this to be the next corridor because of the potential to serve UNCC.

 

Comment Sheets:

Returned: 11

Results:

1. There are numerous criteria that need to be considered when planning a rapid transit system.  Please rank the following criteria in order of their importance to you, with 1 being the least important and10 being the most important:

 Environmental impacts such as noise and contribution to air pollution

Ranked 1: 1 person

Ranked 3: 1 person

Ranked 5: 2 people

Ranked 7: 2 people

Ranked 9: 1 person

Ranked 10: 3 people

Not Ranked: 1 person

 

Cost to build the transit system (capital costs)

Ranked 2: 3 people

Ranked 4: 1 person

Ranked 5: 3 people

Ranked 6: 1 person

Ranked 8: 1 person

Ranked 10: 2 people

 

Cost to operate the transit system (operating/ maintenance costs)

Ranked 3: 1 person

Ranked 5: 4 people

Ranked 6: 2 people

Ranked 7: 2 people

Ranked 10: 1 person

Not Ranked: 1 person

 

Number of people who might ride the system

Ranked 2: 1 person

Ranked 5: 3 people

Ranked 7: 1 person

Ranked 8: 2 people

Ranked 9: 1 person

Ranked 10: 2 people

Not Ranked: 1 person

 

Potential for fostering new development or redevelopment to area surrounding the transit line

Ranked 5: 1 person

Ranked 7: 1 person

Ranked 8: 2 people

Ranked 9: 2 people

Ranked 10: 5 people

 

Reducing travel times in your daily commute

Ranked 1: 1 person

Ranked 5: 3 people

Ranked 6: 1 person

Ranked 8: 1 person

Ranked 10: 4 people

Ranked 11: 1 person

 

Frequency of service

Ranked 2: 1 person

Ranked 4: 1 person

Ranked 5: 1 person

Ranked 7: 2 people

Ranked 8: 2 people

Ranked 10: 4 people

 

Being able to complete your transit trip without making a transfer

Ranked 3: 3 people

Ranked 4: 2 people

Ranked 5: 3 people

Ranked 7: 1 person

Ranked 9: 1 person

Not Ranked: 1 person

           

Having transit serve key entertainment and activity centers such as theaters, shopping centers, universities, large business parks, etc.

Ranked 1: 1 person 

Ranked 5: 1 person

Ranked 8: 3 people

Ranked 9: 3 people

Ranked 10: 3 people

 

Comfort and convenience

Ranked 3: 1 person

Ranked 4: 1 person

Ranked 5: 1 person

Ranked 6: 3 people

Ranked 8: 2 people

Ranked 10: 2 people

Ranked 11: 1 person

 

Cost of a ticket to ride the system

Ranked 1: 1 person

Ranked 2: 2 people

Ranked 4: 1 person

Ranked 5: 3 people

Ranked 6: 1 person

Ranked 7: 1 person

Ranked 8: 1 person

Ranked 10: 1 person

 

 

2. How far would you walk to a transit station near you?

 Less than ¼ mile: 1 person

¼ mile: 2 people

¼ to ½ mile: 7 people

½ mile: 2 people

I would not walk to a station: 1 person

 

 

3. If you would/could not walk to a transit station, which of the following might you do?

 Drive to a park & ride: 8 people

Bicycle to the station: 3 people

Take a feeder bus or shuttle to the station: 7 people

No Ranking: 1 person

 

 4. Other comments:

 Overall I favor alternative #7.

 We live on Howard Street.  An expanded bus service or a feeder bus would be very beneficial to our area and the neighbors closer to W. T. Harris Blvd. via W. Sugar Creek Rd.  A rail station adjacent to the Renaissance Complex would be ideal.

 1. Please make sure you serve the NC49 corridor.  This is where people live now. 2. I favor NE-4.  This is the best long-term solution. (except it's on the wrong side of UNCC.) 3. Added cost of BRT for NE-7 is not worth the relatively small additional net gain in new riders.

 LRT developed in the center of N. Tryon Street.  This approach will assist in the much-needed widening of N. Tryon Street.  Further, perhaps this LRT may spur more redevelopment in the urban areas of the corridor.

 Please recommend NE-6 or NE-7.  Thanks.

 Prefer NE-7 option.

 LRT may be the most expensive to implement bus in the long run it will benefit the community the most by encouraging infill development.

 This project is very important for the region particularly from an environmental/air quality perspective.  The initial costs will be exorbitant, but prove to be a worthy investment in the long run.  I support alternatives NE-3, NE-6 and NE-7.  We need connections to Concord Mills.

 Option 7.

I'm a 12-year-old transit enthusiast.  My first concern is park and ride lots.  When we took a trip to Chicago and road the CTA. We got on at Midway Airport. There were only 120 parking spaces.  I hope CATS will put in adequate park and ride lots.  My second concern would be, continuing the light rail to Lowe's Motor Speedway.  The line should be extended to Lowe's Motor Speedway and should stop at the Verizon Wireless Amphitheater and Lowe's Motor Speedway.  Lowe's Speedway should only be open during events at the speedway.

color bar graphic
View Text-Only
Print This Page
Events Calendar
311 Web Requests
Maps/GIS Locator
Notify Me
Site Help
Feedback

Bus Schedules
Passes/Fares
Riders Alerts
Pass Outlets

CATS Email Service
Press Releases
CATS Careers
Transit Meetings

Riding CATS
Vanpool
Carpool
Park 'N' Rides


logo
Official City of Charlotte & Mecklenburg County Government Web Site